Speed

Quick

Wiedner & McAuliffe

Service

Quality

Everything you want in a firm, plus.

slide shadow

There are a lot of pluses to working with Wiedner & McAuliffe on your workers’ compensation, insurance defense and litigation cases. We consistently move cases faster than other firms. PLUS, we’re known for being more responsive and service-oriented. PLUS, we offer the highest level of technical skill in these areas. On the PLUS side, that’s everything you need to get the results you’re looking for.

Featured Attorneys

Rachel S. Nevarez
Lindsey V Beukema
Daniel J. Gerwitz
Richard E. Hanson

Rachel S. Nevarez

Lindsey V Beukema

Daniel J. Gerwitz

Richard E. Hanson

  • "I have always found W&M to be a firm that is ethical, responsive and knowledgeable about not only what the law is today but also very perceptive about where the law is heading. They have earned my respect and trust many times over."

    -Chip Stride
    Chairman of the Board, FLEx Lighting, Chicago, IL

  • Wiedner & McAuliffe is a Top Performer

    Read More

    We are honored to be named a “Top Performer” by Gallagher Bassett’s LegalScore Program, a data intensive review of law firm performance. Gallagher Bassett thoroughly examined several hundred closed cases over 4 quarters, comparing us to similarly situated law firms. As a result, we were rated a “Top Performer” in those states we serve based on categories such as expense to loss ratio, development of the claim to closure, cost and legal effectiveness, communication, and impact on outcomes.

  • Successful award reversal

    Read More

    In Estate of Danny E. French v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Comm’n, 2018 Il App (3d) 170368WC-U, we successfully reversed an award for permanent and total disability under Section 8(f). After securing evidence that petitioner was more active than he claimed, we took an offensive position, filing for suspension of PTD benefits and requesting a conversion of the PTD award into a man as a whole award under 8(d)2. The Illinois Appellate Court agreed with the Commission’s finding in that regard and even awarded respondent a credit for moneys paid above the MAW finding.

  • The case of the traveling employee

    Read More

    We defended United Airlines in a claim which established that even for traveling employees, the regular commute to the employment premises is not covered under the Workers’ Compensation Act. The petitioner was a flight attendant who was injured on a flight from Denver, where she lived, to a New York Airport. The Appellate Court held that the petitioner was not a traveling employee at the time of the accident. Traveling on a fee-waived United Airlines flight at the time of the accident did not transform her from a regular commuter to a traveling employee as this benefit was available to all United Airlines employees.
Contact Us
CHICAGO

One North Franklin
Suite 1900
Chicago, IL
60606
T 312-855-1105

KANSAS CITY

13200 Metcalf Ave.
Suite 110
Overland Park, KS
66213
T 816-761-3915

LAFAYETTE

11 North Third St.
Lafayette, IN
47901
T 765-362-7553

ROCKFORD

1111 South Alpine Road
Suite 503
Rockford, IL
61108
T 815-227-4300

ST. LOUIS

101 S. Hanley
Suite 1450
St. Louis, MO
63105
T 314-721-3400

© 2021 Wiedner & McAuliffe. All rights reserved. Website by Fishman Marketing | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use