Our readers will recall our recent report on the case where the employer, although granted credit for an apparent overpayment of benefits by the Commission, was denied this credit when the claimant pursued a judgment from the circuit court for the sums awarded for TTD, penalties and fees by the Commission. We were taken aback
Will County Forest Preserve District a/k/a Forest Preserve District of Will County v. IWCC No. M-MR-673 In a shocking reversal of 100 years of practice and precedent, the Appellate Court has determined that a shoulder injury is not covered under the specific loss schedule set forth in Section 8(e)10 of the Act. Denzil Smothers was
Naresh Patel v. Home Depot USA, Inc. No. 2012ILApp(1st) 103217 Naresh Patel filed two claims which were heard together by an Arbitrator who awarded him a total of $22,798.54 in TTD, penalties, and attorneys’ fees. The Arbitrator also granted Home Depot certain credits pursuant to Section 8(j) of the Act. The Commission raised the credit
Melinda Jacobo vs. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission No. No. 3-10-0807 WC Melinda Jacobo appealed a Commission decision awarding her compensation and benefits but denying penalties. Her employer did not. The claim for penalties was based on her employer having stopped paying benefits after an IME. The employer ultimately prevailed on that issue, the appellate court
Professional Transportation, Inc. v. Illinois Workers’ Compensation Commission No. No. 3-10-0783WC In a rare reversal, the Appellate Court struck down an ‘odd-lot’ permanent total disability award. The petitioner, Barry Clarke, suffered a career-ending right knee injury which required several surgeries, including a total knee replacement. He also developed a deep vein thrombosis after the total
Wiedner & McAuliffe, Ltd. is pleased to announce that the firm’s Workers’ Compensation Law – Employers practice was ranked as a top-tier practice group in the Chicago metropolitan area in the U.S. News – Best Lawyers® 2011-2012 Best Law Firms rankings. Now in its second year, the U.S. News – Best Lawyers Best Law Firms
Hastings Mutual Insurance Company v Ultimate Backyard, LLC et al. No. Nos. 1-10-1751, 1-10-3001 (consolidated) The claimant, Javier Vasquez, was injured while working for Ultimate Backyard and filed a claim at the IWCC. Ultimate’s carrier, Hastings Mutual, began to pay benefits under a reservation of rights but later withdrew its acceptance of the claim and
Our Medicare department recently attended a conference for the National Alliance of Medicare Set-Aside Professionals (NAMSAP). At that conference, two representatives from CMS discussed issues with WCMSA submissions and explained why the review process is taking longer than ever. As you may know, when a WCMSA proposal is submitted, CMS prioritizes its review in the
Arcelor Mittal Steel vs. IWCC No. No. 1-10-2180WC The claimant, Robert Common, a union member, injured his right arm at work. He testified that he worked a regular eight-hour shift Monday through Friday. Each Thursday the next week’s schedule was posted: “2” on the schedule indicated that the individual would be assigned a 12-hour shift
Otto Baum Company, Inc. v. IWCC and Tim Hilton No. 4-10-0959WC Tim Hilton was injured while working for Otto Baum Company on August 6, 2008, after which he was taken off work. After diagnostic workup, he was cleared for sedentary work. Otto Baum offered a temporary position within his restrictions. Hilton reported for work but
One North Franklin
13200 Metcalf Ave.
Overland Park, KS
11 North Third St.
2990 N. Perryville Rd.
8000 Maryland Ave.
St. Louis, MO